Skip to main content
Aerial view of Okavango Delta waterways winding through lush green islands

Tanzania or Botswana?

Baseline decision available

The Decision in One Line

Tanzania and Botswana offer fundamentally different experiences

What This Depends On

Key Assumptions

Botswana costs 2-3x more than Tanzania for equivalent quality experiences.

High confidence

Tanzania offers more ecosystem diversity: Serengeti, Ngorongoro, coastal, southern parks.

High confidence

Botswana's Okavango Delta offers unique water-based safari activities unavailable elsewhere.

High confidence

This might change if...

If budget is limited, Tanzania provides better value per day.
If seeking water-based activities, Botswana is the clear choice.
If this is a first safari, Tanzania's diversity may be more appropriate.
If seeking exclusivity above all, Botswana delivers consistently.

Trade-offs to Understand

What you gain

+
Tanzania: Migration and Ngorongoro Crater uniqueness
+
Tanzania: Lower costs, more accessible
+
Botswana: Exceptional exclusivity and low vehicle density

What you accept

-
Tanzania: Higher vehicle density in popular areas
-
Tanzania: Less exclusive feeling
-
Botswana: Very high costs limit trip length

Evidence to Know

Botswana costs 2-3x more than Tanzania for equivalent quality experiences.

Well-established pattern

Safari planning

Tanzania offers more ecosystem diversity: Serengeti, Ngorongoro, coastal, southern parks.

Well-established pattern

Safari planning

Botswana's Okavango Delta offers unique water-based safari activities unavailable elsewhere.

Well-established pattern

Safari planning

Tanzania: Migration and Ngorongoro Crater uniqueness

Trade-off consideration

Tanzania: Higher vehicle density in popular areas

Trade-off consideration

Related Decisions

If you want the official decision

Get a personalized verdict based on your specific situation and priorities.

View Decision